Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

1 comment |  Print | E-Mail Top Press Commentary  


Forgiveness, Not Easy but Necessary

Jonathan Schell, The Daily Star | April 17, 2012

Iran and the P5+1 are moving to draft proposals to address their differences over Iran’s nuclear program. ++ In exchange for the full disclosure of all programs, Iran should be permitted to continue the enrichment of uranium for civilian purposes. ++ This should be facilitated by a grace period as proposed by Pierre Goldschmidt, meaning that Iran will not be penalized if it acknowledges any violations of the NPT, of its safeguards and/or the existence of any undeclared nuclear activities and material.

 

 
 
Comments
Yuki  Yoshida

Wed, Dec 12th 2012, 12:33

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Development of nuclear capability is Iran's inalienable right. But the right should be conditional. It is qualified as its right only if the nuclear power is used for peaceful methods, such as to generate power. However, Iran has firmly opposed to foreign investigation of the nuclear enrichment program, which increases the suspicion of Iran's possession of nuclear weapons or its capability to create such lethal weapons. If Iran continues claiming its peaceful use of nuclear power, it should allow foreign investigation so that its right will be fully respected. But, this should not be done forcibly because there is a potential of Iran using its weapons against Western states or its rival state in the region, Israel.
 

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at atlantic-community.org


Community

You are in the archive of all articles published on atlantic-community.org from 2007 to 2012. To read the latest articles from our open think tank and network with community members, please go to our new website