Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

December 3, 2012 |  1 comment |  Print | E-Mail Atlantic Faces  

Shada Islam, Friends of Europe

Shada Islam is the head of the Asia Programme at Friends of Europe - a Brussels-based European think-tank promoting discussion and debate on the future of the EU.

For over 25 years, she has covered Europe-Asia relations as a correspondent for the Far Eastern Economic Review and the German News Agency. As an expert on Asia, she has broadcast experience with the BBC, Radio France, Deutsche Welle and Radio Netherlands.

She continues to actively write and publish for leading publications on topics such as the integration of Muslim immigrants in Europe and EU ties to Asia.

1. What are your current priorities in your work at Friends of Europe?

The short answer is that we aim to promote stronger strategic cooperation between Asia and Europe. We believe this is critical if we are to tackle key global challenges of the 21st Century. The longer answer is that since the tangible shift in global economic and political power to Asia has far-reaching consequences for the European Union, the Asia Programme at Friends of Europe seeks to study and analyse the myriad of ways in which an ascending, dynamic and self-confident Asia impacts the EU. The rise of Asia is no longer just a foreign policy challenge for Europe. Joint actions with Asian nations are required to tackle global concerns such as climate change, international trade, investments and business, energy security, nuclear proliferation, terrorism, poverty alleviation and human security. Defusing global flashpoints - North Korea, Iran, Burma - require cooperation with Asia. Europe cannot meet its aspirations of becoming a powerful global actor without engaging more actively with a rising Asia. However, Asians are increasingly unsure about Europe's interest in their region and wonder whether Europe is still a relevant global actor. The challenge we face therefore is to push, urge and help the EU to develop a strategic vision for its relations with Asia.

2. How does the rise of Asia affect transatlantic relations?

In today's interconnected and globalised world, peace, stability and prosperity require strong cooperation and consultation between all key players, including of course the US, Europe and leading Asian countries such as Japan, China, India and Indonesia. Transatlantic relations are of course strong - trade and investments are booming - and security cooperation between Europe and the US is intensifying regarding post-revolution assistance to countries in North Africa and the Middle East as well as in Afghanistan and Iraq. However, while the US has already forged strong partnerships with most Asian countries, the EU is still struggling to upgrade its political and diplomatic profile in Asia. Also, there has been some concern in Europe about the emergence of a so-called "G2" which would bring China and the US together but exclude the EU. Both Beijing and Washington have denied this - but the EU remains suspicious. So I suppose the rise of Asia is increasing transatlantic competition as regards making friends and influencing people in the region.

3. What are the differences between Europe and the US in their respective approaches to Asia?

The US is undoubtedly the dominant player in Asia because of the security/military umbrella and alliances it offers to many Asian countries. America's political profile in the region is also very strong and set to become even stronger now that the US is a member of the East Asia Summit. In addition, the Obama Administration made clear from the start that relations with Asia are very high up on Washington's foreign policy agenda. Since then, both the President and US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton have been frequent visitors to Asia and cultivated strong personal relations with the region's leaders. In contrast, the EU, is still largely pre-occupied with the situation in its immediate neighbourhood, including the Balkans and now the Arab Spring. This means that Asia is not a top foreign policy priority. In addition, with no claims to be a military power, the EU is still struggling to improve its standing and reputation in the region. Many Asian countries recognise Europe's economic clout - the EU is the largest trade and investment partners for many Asians - but have yet to recognise and accept Europe as a partner in security. European "soft power" means, however, that Asian countries are struggling to meet European rules and regulations on food, consumer goods, chemicals and the like.

4. What advice would you give to students interested in pursuing a career in international relations?

Go for it! There's nothing more interesting than international politics, especially in the 21st Century. As the world changes rapidly, it is fascinating to see just which countries are able to adapt to the shift in global power structures and those which continue to cling to the past. China's rise and its impact on the rest of the world is a complete story in itself. But I am also excited by the new role being played by Turkey and Indonesia, for instance. Across the world new alliances and new formations are emerging - BRICS, G20 to name just two - and newly empowered nations are demanding a reform of global governance structures in order to have a seat at the top table. The use of social media is changing the way nations and people talk to each other. Oppressive regimes are falling, civil society is emerging as a strong actor in international relations. As I said it is exciting stuff. A career in international relations means life without a dull moment.

 

 
Tags: | transatlantic | US | Relations | EU | Asia |
 
Comments
YI  CHEN

Thu, Dec 6th 2012, 01:13

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Re: Shada Islam, Friends of Europe

How does the rise of Asia affect transatlantic relations?

From my point of view, the best way for Europe to address the rise of China is to embrace the fascinating of the Chinese economy. Since EU is already China’s large trading partner, Europe should sustain a health trading relationship with China. After that, based on a stable and long-term economic relationship, Europe can then deepen the relationship on political perspectives. China and EU actually have large number of common interests, including energy, climate change, Iran and so on. Engagement is the best way for Europe to supervise China and ensure that the huge nation is developing harmoniously just like it always states. Therefore, Europe should do what it should do and can do best, instead of panicking about China. It should take the comparative advantage of more industrialized technology. In the near future, there is more likely to be a triangle among the U.S, China and EU. The three regions would cooperate with each other as well as balance each other. On one hand, the U.S and the Europe have had their fair share of a series of treaties and regimes, the status of the U.S in the world. On the other hand, China and Europe also had disputes over trade as well as human rights problems. Moreover, the U.S and China also have disputes about human rights, trade dumping problems as well as the recent Senkaku Islands Issue, not even mentioning the Taiwan Problem. All these combination of complex issues had resulted in a set of changeable relationships that some times those giants converge while sometimes they diverge. Sometimes China and the EU are on the same side, while sometimes the EU and the U.S work together to against China. There are also cases in which China and the U.S would find themselves in some agreement. In some issues, all the three giants in this triangle are in agreement.
Therefore, for Europe, the best strategy is to manage China’s integration into the established global system smoothly and peacefully. Usually rising powers of a nation or a region always result in catastrophically disruption of the global order. Therefore, it is the EU’s responsible to keep an eye on China as well as balancing the power of the U.S to ensure that all three are on the right track to develop and do not let the history to repeat itself.
 

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at atlantic-community.org


Community

You are in the archive of all articles published on atlantic-community.org from 2007 to 2012. To read the latest articles from our open think tank and network with community members, please go to our new website