Time to Force Pakistan's Hand
Ronald Neumann, fmr. US Amb. to Afghanistan | December 1, 2011
With time running out in Afghanistan, the current US strategy that waffles between placating Pakistan and being tough on insurgents will not succeed. ++ The US should go directly after militant sanctuaries, regardless of which side of the border they are on. ++ Concurrently, the US should keep its hand held out to the ruling Pakistani military; we are still willing to be allies, but you must get tougher on terrorists. ++ This is a dangerous policy that risks destabilizing a nuclear armed nation, but the other option is clear: defeat.





Fri, Dec 9th 2011, 19:14
Erica Mukherjee, NYU, Silver Contributor (51)
The most crucial gap in the article is the articulation of the difference between the Pakistani government and the Pakistani military. Mr. Neumann sees them similar enough to use the words interchangeably. In reality, there is a wide rift between the civilian government and the military establishment. In many instances the goals of these two organizations are diametrically opposed; it is conjectured that much of the time the government isn't even aware of all the military's actions. Through into this equation the notoriously opaque ISI and Mr. Neumann's recommendation for combining a bombing campaign with increased financial aid appears to be nothing less than disastrous.
Unfortunately, I do not have a cure-all for this intractable conflict. If the US wants Pakistan’s trust and cooperation in eradicating insurgents on the Afghani border, however, they need to engage with both the government and the military. In today’s Pakistan the power lies, for better or worse, with the military’s guns.