Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

March 26, 2009 |  4 comments |  Print  Your Opinion  

A Bulgarian Should Head NATO

Ira Louis Straus: Bulgaria’s former foreign minister Solomon Passy is the best candidate running for the position of NATO Secretary General. His better understanding of Atlanticism stems out of Bulgarian Atlanticism, which unlike most Eastern European Atlanticisms has managed to overcome Cold War attitudes.

The race for the position of Secretary General of NATO has almost come to an end. Until recently, a Pole, a Czech, and a Canadian were competing for the spot. However, disqualifying factors against all three of them allowed a new candidate to enter the race. The new candidate is without doubt the best candidate: Solomon Passy of Bulgaria.

Passy was the founder of the first Atlanticist organization in Eastern Europe, the Bulgarian Atlantic Club, in 1990. He subsequently became Foreign Minister of Bulgaria. In 2004 he was the chairman-in-office of the OSCE. However, as Passy’s victory is far from certain, the best way to win the post is by presenting himself as a compromise candidate. That means coming across as an Eastern European free of the divisive tendencies of other Eastern European candidates, who might threaten to alienate the Western European core from the alliance. Passy, is not just better than other candidates in terms of the qualities he possesses, but he is also the one candidate who has a deep knowledge of the meaning of Atlanticism. He is the one who is most aware of what NATO was intended to be, and what it can become.

Passy's strength: A deeper understanding of Atlanticism

In post-communist Europe, the Bulgarian Atlanticists stand out as the ones who managed to create the only genuinely new "new Atlanticism.” They developed their ideas independent from NATO and reconstructed a large part of the underlying pre-NATO Atlanticism, but in an updated form. They saw in Atlanticism an honest and successful internationalism, which could be used to prevent a return to nationalism and could replace the failed Communist internationalism in an era when interdependence was on the rise. Thus, they have managed to free their Atlanticism from Cold War assumptions, in a way that even NATO would envy. NATO's official policy line is that it no longer views Russia as an enemy. However, as its databases and raison d'etre date only as far back as 1949, NATO has often had a hard time convincing itself of this.

"Atlanticism" is often perceived as nothing more than an anti-Russian orientation, or when put even more crudely, a pro-American or pro-NATO orientation. This is not the case for Bulgarians and this is what differentiates them from everyone else who has gone by the name of Atlanticist.

Weaknesses of the other candidates: Disqualifying negatives

The “Disqualifying negatives” is the underlying factor, which makes the Bulgarian candidate the most fit to lead NATO in the present era. Bulgarian Atlanticism trumps both Eastern European Atlanticisms, which are steeped into Cold War era presents and Western European Atlanticisms, which suffer from never-ending disputes on burden sharing, ESPD development and, the exact balance in relation between the EU and NATO. Both Eastern and Western European Atlanticism are backward looking. The urgency of the tasks facing the Western alliance demands that the new Secretary General is a forward-looking one. The culture of Bulgarian Atlanticism is the only one suited to produce the right person for the job.

To summarize, the need to move beyond old internecine disputes disqualifies Western European candidates. The Canadian one is ruled out due to nationality, the Catholic Eastern European candidates are ruled out by the need to defeat Cold War mentalities. That leaves only one candidate: the Bulgarian, Solomon Passy.
 
Dr. Ira Louis Straus is coordinator of the American branch, Committee on Eastern Europe and Russia in NATO.

  • 12
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
Carmelo  Molina

March 27, 2009

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Maybe the problem for one of "the Catholic Eastern European candidates" is not your opinion that he is ruled out by the need to defeat Cold War mentalities (sic! For example, that ex KGB agent "put in" for the next Russian Presidency and so on and so on...?), but the fact he is "too good" candidate indeed.

If Cold War means for instance "Solidarity", experience in Afghanistan during the Soviet invasion or being in Ost-Berlin the same night of the fall of the Berlin Wall, and post-Cold War imply becoming a full NATO member in the first ampliation, maybe the ironic minus for Radosław Sikorski could be he has been never in any anti-NATO demostration like Mr. Javier Solana before he became the NATO Secretary General.

Anyway, Radosław Sikorski is still young and he can still wait for another chance in NATO or maybe for another high position in the UE (will he be the next " Javier Solana"?).

...or maybe this "Catholic Central-Eastern European candidate", with British passport and a US citizen wife will be finally the next NATO Secretary General...

Tags: | Radoslaw Sikorski |
 
Marie  Grunert

March 27, 2009

  • 4
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I like this article, I think it raises a very important issue. Due to the very bad conditions in which the relations between Russia and NATO are, especially in light of the South Ossetian conflict a "compromising candidate" as successor to de Hoop Scheffer is needed. Even though the way ahead for (re)constructing a fruitful relation between Russia and NATO is long, as long as the question of NATO enlargement in Georgia - and especially the Ukraine - is on the table, bringing a Pole as a successor - or the same holds true for any Russophobic country - will certainly not help. We need to work together as security concerns everybody and include Russia in our security architecture.

What is more, I believe that combining the fact of the non hostility towards Russia plus the Eastern European nationality, making the new Secretary coming from Bulgaria, a new EU and NATO country would also be beneficial. In fact, it would mean that it is not always the same who hold the reins.

Having said that, I was wondering what you were thinking about Rasmussen who is not mentioned in the article. He of course is not from a new entry (Denmark is a founding NATO member and member of the EC since 1973) but his candidacy seems to be supported by some important Eu countries (Fr, De, UK) and recently the US decided to be in favour as well. Yet, according to the latest debates Turkey seems to oppose his candidacy and this must/will be taken into the equation.

Thank you
 
Marek  Swierczynski

March 28, 2009

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
To Carmelo: Radek Sikorski is not a man that would fit into the new NATO framework, his ambitions are too large and his personality too independent. We should realise that NATO Secretary General is not in fact the leader of NATO, as the Alliance is not an independent international body, it only executes some of the sovereign prerogatives of its member-states in the area of defence. Hence, the Secretary General is just a Secretary General, he may have his personal views but can not implement them freely, he's a tool rather than a hand. Radek Sikorski with his sharp views on international affairs, strong judgement on most delicate issues is not prepared to be a tool, he'd rather become a hand that uses the tool. We can see him running for the country's presidency in 10 years time.
Tags: | Radek Sikor |
 
Marie-Claude  Corneauster

March 28, 2009

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
so the positions are pricey, umm not very dangerous though
 

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at atlantic-community.org


Community

You are in the archive of all articles published on atlantic-community.org from 2007 to 2012. To read the latest articles from our open think tank and network with community members, please go to our new website