Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

May 18, 2012 |  14 comments |  Print  Your Research  

Topic Term Paper: Anti-Corruption in Afghanistan and Pakistan: What Works and What Doesn't

Ahmad Rashid Jamal: Corruption is a severe problem in many Asian countries, especially in Afghanistan and Pakistan. This paper assesses the effectiveness of anti-corruption strategies and accountability in these two countries and asks: Can Anti-corruption Agencies turn into effective organizations?

A distinct and single anti-corruption institution cannot function as an omnipotent and supreme institution. In order to combat and eradicate corruption it is necessary to reform all governmental institutions and make them capable of effectively implementing their mandate and developing coordination and inter linkages among entities. Among underlying theoretical models, monitoring and incentives programs are typically based  on the principal–agent model. In this model the “principal”, the population at large, wants to achieve some goals and the “agent”, typically a civil servant, seeks to implement this goal.

It is often difficult for the principal to know if the agent is achieving the principal’s goal or following his or her own agenda, given that the end goal can be difficult to observe. Monitoring and incentives model increases the probability of agent’s punishment, who is engaging in corrupt activities. Therefore, monitoring is not effective without incentives agendas. The anti-corruption strategies in Afghanistan and Pakistan should include monitoring and incentives programs to increase the efficiency of policies.

Afghanistan and Pakistan need to adopt a zero tolerance policy on corruption. If there is a mutual standard in the society, where small corruption is tolerated in private sector, then it is unfeasible for the society to eradicate corruption and become clean.

 

Challenges and Recommendations

  • Firstly, given these countries’ (Afghanistan and Pakistan) economic problems and political fragility, it is unlikely to expect reforms to eradicate corruption in a few months. Reforms should concentrate on role of information and foreign constraints- a free press, broad auditing, democratic controls, the courts and external strain from international institutions.

  • Secondly, there should be adequate legal support for the Anti-corruption Agencies (ACA) to investigate corruption. To investigate corruption and carry out effective enforcement a government needs strong power and political will by passing effective legislations.

  • Thirdly, the ACA should be independent in implementing of its enforcement work without political obstructions and interference.

 

Ahmad Rashid Jamal is an MA student at Universität Konstanz.

 
  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
Tags: | aca | Pakistan | Afghanistan | Anti-corruption |
 
Comments
Unregistered User

May 26, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Great article It is really practical for both countries, you did a really nice research. Best of luck my dear brother.
 
Unregistered User

May 26, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Mr. Jamal!

You are really doing the best academic researches. I know, for Afghanistan you are the best flame. Wish you long life and all Afghans love you.....

Kabul, Afghanistan
 
Unregistered User

May 26, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
For Ahmad Rashid Jamal

Your paper is really promising. It is nice and well structured. You used so many data. It is practically evaluated and very sweet written. I am sure that you are making you country and your people proud. You are great with your authentic knowledge. It clarifies that Afghanistan has really good talented youths like you. Very super and outstanding job. Wish you all the best.


Danish

Denmark
 
Unregistered User

May 29, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I have reviewed the paper, the author put lots of efforts and worked really hard. I appreciate your hardworking. I feel proud of such educated youths. Great work MR. JAMAL waiting to see you in peaks of success.


Best....

Maroof Hamidi
 
Unregistered User

May 30, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Salam Jamal Aziz.

I have seen a really nice recommendation from author's side. I hope that Afghan government should receive your research and implement it. It is really nice organized and it explains the weak points of the Anti corruption institutions in Afghanistan. It is really great work.


Kindest regards

 
Unregistered User

May 30, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Thank you! "We" in the US pretend "You" in Afghanistan need our help.... but only toward institutions we know are flawed and corrupt. Thank you for showing there are real people there who are not only capable of self rule there, but an inspiration here in the US! "WE THE PEOPLE"!
Tags: | democracy promotion |
 
Ahmad Rashid  Jamal

May 30, 2012

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Lena/Brenda Strand
Christian

The research has demonstrated the points which are so weak in Afghanistan and Pakistan. You can read the research it says that Pakistan was corrupt before establishment of Afghanistan Government in 2001. Therefore, a neighbor who is corrupt, will deficit the others in the region too. Afghanistan has different relations with Pakistan.
Tags: | Anti-corru |
 
Unregistered User

May 30, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Mr. Rashid Jamal

It is really difficult job to draw a conclusion from the descriptive Strategies of Anti-corruption policies, but you did a wonderful job. There is no other sources to compare the neighboring countries. I found is really practical and interesting. I could not stop reading the whole pages.

I am very grateful and wish you best of lucks.
 
Unregistered User

May 30, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I can only say it is incredible research and explains everything so concise and true... Keep it up Ustad Jamal..
 
Unregistered User

May 30, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Great article from a great personality. Young and hardworking man. God bless you. It really interesting to read papers like this.

Khorsand....
 
Unregistered User

May 31, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?

Very nice and good job. keep it up.
 
Unregistered User

July 8, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
great job Jamal

I like the way you argue

best
 
Unregistered User

July 18, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?

Dear Researcher,

I am so sorry to see these 20 pages without any specific suggestions for fighting against corruption. The researcher thinks that only if there is a monitoring and incentive strategy, the corruption will disappear, while that is completely a wrong suggestion.

I expected you to firstly define what is corruption? How it is related to management of the organizations? What are the benchmarks and how to measure the achievements against corruption? How the nature of corruption is different in two countries? Where do you see the corruption? What are the main reasons of corruption and then what are the worlds best practices to fight against it?

Your research paper is based on very generalized simple theories without practical useful suggestions.


Kind regards
 
Unregistered User

August 2, 2012

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Mujtaba Zahir,

I am sure you did not read the text the questions you have mentioned have been addressed in this the page 4 and 5. In the theoretical and introduction of the Research you can find your answers. Read the parts of recommendations and suggestions. It indicates about the significant recommendations.

I am working in the government of Afghanistan, up to date, we did not have such an authentic research and academic paper. Now, We are trying to desperate the task of Anti-corruption efforts, as mentioned in this paper too.

I think you did not read the research paper. It is not only theoretical. It has significant data from Transparency international 2011. Two countries have been compared. How do you say that it is generalized theory. It show that you can not distinguish theory and practical studies.

Please, before writing some abusive texts read the research carefully....


Ahamdi
 

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at atlantic-community.org


Community

You are in the archive of all articles published on atlantic-community.org from 2007 to 2012. To read the latest articles from our open think tank and network with community members, please go to our new website