Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

January 9, 2009 |  5 comments |  Print  Your Opinion  

Christiane   Doerner

Colonialism Reloaded: China Is Conquering Namibia

Christiane Doerner: China has arrived in Namibia and with it a new form of colonialism has unfolded. Its effect on Namibia’s domestic industry as well as its employment rate is discernibly negative.

 

China is establishing a formidable presence in Namibia. In the last few years it has moved in large numbers of people as well as taking up numerous business opportunities. In the capital city Windhoek, for example, Quingdao Construction recently put up a huge sign indicating that it has been contracted to construct another section of Namibia's new state house, the country's new national icon and the subject of much controversy as a result of the foreign capital which is building it. On each incoming daily flight from Johannesburg to Windhoek there arrive typically between five and eight nationals of Chinese origin, all of whom are obviously greeted by their families and not by tour operators. In the Oshikango region in the north of Namibia, the number of Chinese shops increased four-fold between 2004 and 2006; they have been accompanied by the opening of "China Town" and "China Village" complexes.

In parallel to this apparent "bottom-up" strategy, China is also buying its way into Namibia by giving grants and interest-free loans to the nation. In 2007, China loaned N$1bn (€83m) to Namibia in order to buy Chinese software to use across Namibian public service organizations. Is it a case of conquering Namibia, along with the rest of Africa? Undoubtedly, China has become a major player in the competition for African resources across the continent. It is giving a several billion US dollar credit line to Angola, an oil-rich country. And as in Namibia, this is accompanied by Chinese construction firms rebuilding roads, schools and clinics.

Chinese influence on Namibia is not a novelty. In the covert war of the 1970s and 1980s, when the South West African People's Organisation (SWAPO) fought for liberation from South Africa, China provided weapons, money and moral support to Namibia. This has not been forgotten by SWAPO, the ruling party in Namibia since its independence in 1990. Perhaps Namibia is repaying old debts by allowing this enormous influx of Chinese people and investment. Namibia's Ministry of Home Affairs has allegedly issued about 20,000 work permits for Chinese citizens in a country with a total population of just over 2 million and an official unemployment rate of more than 40% (Grobler, 2006:2). The effect of such measures is already being felt by local business and the local population. Civil work in Namibia, which has predominantly used local labor, is largely carried out through Chinese construction firms bidding at 30% below current market prices. This undercutting is driving local firms out of business, thus increasing unemployment in a sector which traditionally provides work for the most vulnerable people in the community. 

The nature of the investment is also troublesome. Looking at the situation on a macro-economic level, evidence shows that almost all Chinese exports are manufactured goods - appliances, clothing and other light manufacturing, whereas Namibian exports to China are fish, ores and minerals. One may add uranium to that list, a resource high on China's wish list for the future. Early in 2008, China acquired a 12 percent stake in the Australian-based Rio Tinto group, which has a 69 percent interest in Namibia's major uranium mine, Rössing Uranium. The conclusion to be drawn from analysis of the import-export trade is that China exports labour-intensive, value-added products to Namibia and imports goods from Namibia that are mainly non-sustainable commodities, creating few, if any, jobs for Namibians in the process.

The Namibian President Hifikepunye Pohamba has publicly declared that he is very keen to develop bilateral cooperation in an effort to bring benefits to both countries. China is clearly benefiting from access to scarce resources, but what is Namibia's share in these deals? Whilst China - in urgent need of natural resources for its growing economy - is fiercely battling out the contest for Namibia's and Africa's resources, one thing is clear: ultimately, this new "scramble" is doing little to enhance Africa's overall development.

Christiane Doerner was Senior Lecturer in Business Administration at The Polytechnic of Nambia in Windhoek until 2008. She has also served as Advisor to the World Bank and Sales Manager at ABB in India and Germany and is currently working as Executive Search Consultant in Germany. She holds a postgraduate degree in business administration from Cologne University.


Related Material from the Atlantic Community:

  • 26
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
Jacques  COULARDEAU

January 18, 2009

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
"Early in 2008, China acquired a 12 percent stake in the Australian-based Rio Tinto group, which has a 69 percent interest in Namibia's major uranium mine, Rössing Uranium."

Do you mean to say China is buying a small share of the non-Namibian-Aistralian-based business that is exploiting, I mean looting and raiding, the uranium resources of Namibia? Are you ready to ask for that Rio Tinto Group to be nationalized in Namibia for it to be really Namibian?

It's a question and nothing but a question, because I can't imagine you may even mean 10% of what you've written which is biassed, at least.

By the way the market level you're speaking of, what market is it? The internatioanl market? The Namibian market? the Chinese market? Do you use exchange rate values or PPP values? You do not specify, which means your article is not easy to capture, let alone understand in its motivations.

Jacques
Tags: | highly surprised | amazed |
 
Christiane   Doerner

January 27, 2009

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Mr Coulardeau,
Yes, it is a fact that China bought this stake in Rio Tinto.
No, I am not alluding to nationalising anything.
What exactly are you referring to when you say I cannot mean 10% of what I have written? Please specify.
If I use currency values I used the exchange rate prevailing at the time the article was published.
What is it that you do not understand, Mr Coulardeau? If you specify I shall be grateful to get back to you. Regards, C Doerner
Tags: | Be specific |
 
Unregistered User

March 21, 2009

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I cannot understand why the world takes chinese businesses in africa as a threat.
we must understand that they are only responding to the demand as business people. there is a demand for goods and services they provide, obviously at the price most others cannot offer. why dont we take this positively and evey country can try and work out how to benefit from this emerging power rather than fearing it. China as i know is a cultured nation with good values and very focused and committed government. this has resulted into the country developing with one of fastest growth rate in world. Its upto all the countries to creat right channels that can benefit their own nations without bringing protectionsim and discrimination against china and chinese people . Times are changing and we must accept and learn to live with Globalization and take the right steps to get to global stage and reaping the benefits as a open and globalized nation. African nations and all other nations must look at China not with historic prospective but Futuristic Opportunities with right balance mutually benefical to all.
 
Unregistered User

August 20, 2010

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
i would like to thanks to both been said something between Namibian and China cooperation. all of you may right or wrong to what you been said or give comment.

for me i can not said china want took the chance for Namibian to do something or said china want to take opportunity. because what china is try to do for our country is development and support the Namibian to have good living condition and be on standard like other country.

if China was a undeveloped country, i can say he want to gain something from us and run away.
i am living almost two years in china study Chinese but the living standard of china compare with our country in all, we are very far from china. i think we don't need to discriminated China while is try to help us.

i am agree with Mr. Mazhar Amin what he said Chinese has cultured nation with good values and very focused and committed government. i am total agree with him

thanks.
Tags: | tshaanika@gmail.com |
 
Unregistered User

August 30, 2010

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I am in agreement with the views of some of these comments. I think the view of modern colonialism and Chinese interest in Namibia is short sighted, ridiculous and outlandish based on the examples you have presented. A classic example which one should consider on a smaller scale. The commonwealth of Dominica has been working effectively with the Chinese people to increase the living standards of themselves. This should not or rather should never be the case had the former colonial powers not decimated this island and pillage there resources. So onto Namibia, China is filling a void created by decades of sheer suffering, which is not unique to Namibia on this continent. You mentioned the country is experiencing 40% unemployment, if a new fresh unexploited attempt is made by China, it's worth a try. Namibia knows what colonialism is about, for them to accept the aid of the Chinese similar to Dominica there must be something genuine about there overture. Time will tell, history cannot be bound to repeat itself, can it.
 

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at atlantic-community.org


Community

You are in the archive of all articles published on atlantic-community.org from 2007 to 2012. To read the latest articles from our open think tank and network with community members, please go to our new website