Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

April 1, 2011 |  1 comment |  Print  Your Research  

Anush  Hayrapetyan

Term Paper: Democratization in the South Caucuses

Anush Hayrapetyan: The process of democratization is still ongoing in the South Caucuses . This paper identifies obstacles, challenges and achievements so far. Moreover, solutions are offered as to how the region can move forward in the future.

 

This paper focuses on the countries of Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia, who are on their way to becoming democratic societies. But, what do we mean by "democratization"? The process of making a society free, which includes ensuring freedom of speech, freedom of the press, free trade and freedom of assembly among others.

The problem is that there is a long way to go in the region, particularly from an economic perspective, as many resources remain monopolized. Moreover, despite having formal multiparty systems, dissent is not always tolerated.

Patience is key for this process. It is important not to rush through changes and end up with strange hybrids like "dictocracies".

Anush Hayrapetyan is studying for a LLM degree in Public International Law and Human Rights at Riga Graduate School of Law.

 

Read related articles from atlantic-copmmunity.org members:

 
  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
Alan  Ng

May 6, 2011

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
The paper offers a very pragmatic look at the complexities of democratization. In its most developed forms, democracy is the best way to protect the rights of the citizens and ensure a just and peaceful society.

The process in the south Caucasus is certainly very interesting and there is no doubt that each nation is at a different state in its development. I would argue that Georgia and Armenia are definitely on the right track, but I don't see any clearly signs of democracy developing in the Azerbaijan given the current Aliyev Regime, although there have been recent protests.

We also have to keep in mind the complex political relationship that exists int he region. The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict, I would argue, makes the democratic process almost impossible as Azerbaijan and Armenia are embroiled in a significant territorial dispute. The need for strong leadership in these types of violent conflicts can be a source of strength for the ruling parties.

I think that barring any real progress regarding the contested territory, the spread of internet access (and social media networks such as twitter and facebook) can provide an effective way to spread the ideals of democracy. We have seen this in the Arab world. As the youth in these nations become disaffected by lack of opportunity, these mechanisms are ideal for the rise of opposition.

 

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at atlantic-community.org


Community

You are in the archive of all articles published on atlantic-community.org from 2007 to 2012. To read the latest articles from our open think tank and network with community members, please go to our new website