Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

May 5, 2008 |  3 comments |  Print  Your Opinion  

Andreas  Umland

Gorbachev Number Two: Dmitry Medvedev

Andreas Umland: Sooner or later it is to be expected that Medvedev’s deeper political beliefs – his apparently liberal and democratic views – will come to the fore.

The majority of Russian and Western observers see the man who will become the new President of the Russian Federation this month as an only relatively liberal figure, if not as a faceless opportunist. Some even think that Medvedev will be a second Putin whose rise means merely more of what we have seen during the last eight years. However, Medvedev's early political biography and most recent statements on such issues as multi-party competition, freedom of the press, or Russia's relations to the West point in a different direction. Should the Russian presidential administration come under the lasting and full control of Medvedev, the Kremlin will become a focal point of pro-democratic tendencies in Moscow. This development could lead to a situation reminiscent of an earlier period of transition that gained fame under its Russian name perestroika.

Such a prediction follows from a closer look on Medvedev's curriculum vitae which is dissimilar from Putin's. The outgoing and future Russian presidents are both jurists who grew up and studied at St. Petersburg. Yet, not only has the thirteen years younger Medvedev no known KGB background. He started to be active in politics already during the heydays of Gorbachev's glasnost when Putin was still serving for the KGB in Dresden. Researching for an advanced law degree at Leningrad State University, in early 1989, Medvedev also worked as an election campaigner for his professor Anatolyi Sobchak - then a prominent leader of Russia's emerging democratic movement running for a seat in the USSR parliament. This was, to be sure, only a brief episode in Medvedev's biography. His later posts within the St. Petersburg City as well as the Russian Presidential Administrations and as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Russia's huge gas monopoly Gazprom as well as his work as Deputy Prime Minister of Russia were what determined his political career. Yet, Medvedev's brief involvement in the Russian democratic movement in 1989 is still significant. That was a time when it was not yet entirely clear whether the Soviet system was indeed at its end, and when becoming an anti-communist activist was still something of a risk.

Medvedev will acquire substantial powers within the next weeks. If he is able to consolidate his new position in the following couple of years, we should, at one point or another, expect that he will be trying to change Russia's political system in a direction similar to that in which Gorbachev tried to stir the Soviet Union's. Such a move by Medvedev is by no means destined to be successful as it will encounter stiff opposition by many of Moscow's currently dominant elite groups. Whatever the eventual outcome of such attempts to re-open the Russian political system may be, the period of relative macro-political stability in post-Soviet Russia will soon be over.

 

[The full text of this comment is attached below. A somewhat different version appeared earlier on the web site of Prospect-Magazine, No. 144, March 2008.]

 
  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
Donald  Stadler

May 8, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Ummmm - perhaps. The question is whether the youthful fling in 1989 represents the *real* Medvedev or whether his body of work since then is more indicative - not that I really know anything about his career. But I find it unlikely that he's a youthful idealist.

This reminds me of the period when the USSR was in it's ascendency and Western intellectuals strained to find signs of the 'liberalism' of each successive General Secretary, culminating with some hailing former KGB head Andropov as a 'closet liberal'!

But then Gorbachev came along, and for once the hopeful voices were correct. But the mid-80's were fundamentally different to the situation today; Russia is not under the kinds of economic pressure that they were in 1985. They seem to be riding high, so the question is whether Medvedev (if he is a closet Gorbechev) can muster the argument for reform within the current nomenklatura - I rather doubt it.

The fact that Medvedev lacks a KGB backgound may be significant - or not. I suspect we won't see his real stripes for quite a while because Putin is still the dominant figure in Russia, and until that changes the scope of action for Medvedev will be constrained, I think.
 
Unregistered User

May 10, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Medvedev is also seen as a more liberal figure in french papers, even he wouldn't be that Putin's "groom" that we were told, that he mays surprise us.
Anyway we need Russia among the western "civilisation" countries front, because the caucasiens are not the dominating ethnical group anymore in the globalisation, new mighty states, such as China, India, latin America will hold the pill high
 
Ilyas M. Mohsin

June 1, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Franchie' bias for Russia appears to be farcical. Even Hitler had such notions in a highly monstrous proportion. With such a mindset, Globalisation would end up as a practical joke. No wonder it is not making much progress.
Medvedev is already at it and understandably Putin appears to endorse his moves. franchie may be disappointed as Russia warms up to China despite the civilazational Halo projected above.
Real-poitic, generally, transcends all mrginal considerations and that appears to be the lesson of history.
 

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at atlantic-community.org


Community

You are in the archive of all articles published on atlantic-community.org from 2007 to 2012. To read the latest articles from our open think tank and network with community members, please go to our new website