Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

March 18, 2008 |  2 comments |  Print  Your Opinion  

Marek  Swierczynski

Iraq Five Years on: the Polish Perspective

Marek Swierczynski: Poland’s decision to join the “coalition of the willing” has left the military stretched beyond capacity, the society in serious mistrust of their leaders and perception of a joint effort for a good cause seriously damaged. It took 25 lives 5 years and 3 governments to rethink and withdraw.

With more than 15 000 troops in 10 tours of duty so far Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) remains the largest military effort undertaken by the armed forces of the independent polish state. This effort terminates later this year, as the PM Donald Tusk promised withdrawal of the contingent and president Lech Kaczynski signed orders which allow for use of the polish forces in Iraq until October the 31st 2008.

Little time is spent today on debating Iraq. The issue fell victim to more „exciting" questions, like the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty and notably Afghanistan, which was in deep shadow of Iraq. Observers have to rely on media reports, think-tank debates and public opinion polls. The outcome is gloom.

Wrong war. Poland's engagement in Iraq was based on the strategic bilateral alliance with the US and a sense of duty to the international community.Poland's leaders quoted intelligence sources and the allies' reasurements of Iraq's wrongdoing and lethal danger as grounds for going to war. It took them more than 3 years to admit they were misled and deceived. Interpretation of what is national interest evolved and only recently inclined to the general anti-war mood.

Little gains. The aim of strenghtening the bilateral strategic relation with the US has failed. The graphic proof for that is the planned missile defence deployment, where Poland is desperately trying to secure some hardware for its defence capabilities with little positive response so far.

Military experience. The iraqi mission was a major testground for both line units, supplies, logistics and command structures. Reality has been quite far away from what the operation was planned for. Goals of the mission have evolved from peace-enforcement and stabilization to training and again to peace-enforcement. As Afghanistan became number one task for NATO, Poland realised it can not lead two such operations at a time. Hence the choice has been made to focus on Afghanistan.

Public distrust. The pro-war lobby which led Poland to Iraq is suffering political defeat. The post-communist party, responsible for sending troops to Iraq is merely marginalised. The right-wing conservatives who supported keeping the mission lost the last general election to a moderate center-right, whose leaders maintain that Poland fulfilled its mission and has well deserved the right to leave.

Making foes. Keeping on the American side complicated Poland's position within the EU in the early stage of its membership and made it more difficult for diplomacy to negotiate important EU matters.

Balance sheet. It is justified to conclude that Poland did not gain much on OIF. Whether it did loose, that remains to be analysed in detail. As it seems however, the current asessment of OIF makes further such decissions more difficult, if not impossible.

The above is a summary. Full text here

  • 57
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
Tags: | Poland | Iraq | USA | EU | Operation Iraqi Freedom |
 
Comments
Unregistered User

March 20, 2008

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
this is what happens when you play a game with US. they will suck you dry for ALL your worth. you are simply an amature when it comes to playing ball with US imperialist. they will string you along use you for their aims and the polish people will be left holding the bag with your relations in taters with your neighbors that mean no harm to poles..
 
Unregistered User

March 10, 2012

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Greetings to the writer of this article and the readers

I am still shocked a bit form the fact that Poland has committed this engagement in a war far away from the strategic view that links any stable promising democracy like Poland after years of suppression under the red block and the problems followed the disintegration of the soviet block. We all know that Poland is a growing power, it wants to exercise this and play on the distinguished geographical location it has. being the bridge between east and west, and we like it or not, there is west and there is east, Poland stands also in a critical situation, the east has got a history there, and west let her alone in 1939. As an Arab nationalist, i can tell that from viewing and monitoring the moves made by the Polish leaders after joining the EU are not what the world and the benefits of this good country would like, the west is not the balance mighty power as we see that in Afghanistan (the fighting is not over) and the US agenda is not about toppling Saddam Housien, it is far more deep in the region full of oil and old colonies combined with the created cloned entity called state of Israel with the territorial interests. we all know too that supporting the outpost of colonialism in that region needs a superiority not only in weapons but also in territory, Israel must be the biggest street among the streets there, all this might be seen as Arab plot or conspiracy talk , but if you look at this you can understand that the chaos theory started in Iraq and Afghanistan spread to Other Arab countries under what is called as the Arab spring! anyway, It is not one of Poland's major messages for the people of the region who were seeing this country as a friend more than an enemy, what could Saddam could do to Poland? as we remember the Tank constructed by Iraqis was called Babylion was made by Polish kits, and engaging in this war will not spare the Poles from paying the tax on the international scale and Poland's economy is not able to handle that kind of interventions plus, what is the outcome of this war? US troops are out, defeated, two journalists from Poland killed as i could find and the spending for military scale raised. Russia still the Old friend/ Enemy, and what else? Did Poland went to war with USA in Iraq to gain some training in NATO ? or to have some tanks and some equipments? they will suck you dry, we know the west well, we tried it many times...do you think that USA will prevent any crazy rage of the white red bear on your east??? i think that helping USA in its comical war on terror is not more than licking ass than strategic wisdom, it is more or less following the stronger because he is strong...but every one has to look for his benefits...Ask the Kuwaitis what they gained from the Americans, now they cannot even move a soldier to the bases where the liberators are standing though it is Kuwaiti land, we love Poland we don't want to see this nice country crashed or divided again between two Poles were and will always direct events here or there. invading Iraq was a mistake, in the long term you will see the results.
 

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at atlantic-community.org


Community

You are in the archive of all articles published on atlantic-community.org from 2007 to 2012. To read the latest articles from our open think tank and network with community members, please go to our new website