Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

October 22, 2010 |  12 comments |  Print  Your Opinion  

Sidra  Tariq

The Great Pakistani Floods: Crisis and Apathy

Sidra Tariq: The international media’s apathy in covering the 2010 Pakistan floods has been one of the most disappointing aspects of the crisis. With grossly exaggerated reports of Taliban involvement in the rescue efforts, it seems as if the international media and community have forgotten about the predicament of the innocent flood victims.

Finally, their ordeal is over! Rescued now and recuperated, the 33 Chilean miners can look forward to a new beginning, thanks to the international media’s meticulous round-the-clock coverage that propelled the rescue efforts forward. I wish I could credit them for meeting out the same treatment regarding the worst ever floods in the history of Pakistan, which have affected 20 million people and have exceeded the combined total of victims of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami as well as the 2005 Pakistan and 2010 Haiti earthquakes. At present, the western media has completely blacked out news about the plight of such a huge number of stranded people. Yet, news regarding the burning of NATO’s supply containers in Pakistan has been quite successfully incorporated into the headlines.

The floods have caused colossal damage to agriculture, industry, trade, communications, as well as public and private property. Nearly 70% of Pakistan’s population earns a living from agriculture and about 74,000 km2 of the most fertile crop land has been inundated by the flood waters. The International Labor Organization reported that more than 5.3 million jobs have been lost due to the floods and there is the possibility of long term food shortages.  The overall cost of the damage is estimated to be 5 billion US dollars, a number which is bound to increase. Furthermore, diseases pose a new threat to the health of victims as well as livestock.

Some sections of the international press have expressed concern that the floods will divert the Pakistani military’s attention away from fighting the Taliban. Reports have been circulating that the Taliban have been making inroads in the affected regions by engaging in the relief efforts.However, the fact remains that the level of devastation is such that most of the roads are still under water and only the Pakistan Army or Navy have access to them. The hype created by suggesting that there is any Taliban involvement is baseless. Besides, not a single incident to date supports this viewpoint.

The Army and Navy troops deployed in the affected areas have completed the evacuation process, rescuing more than 400,000 people. In response to Pakistan’s appeal, limited assistance has started pouring in. The United Nations raised the sum sought by its disaster appeal from 0.46 to 2 billion US dollars. Nevertheless, the situation in the ensuing months is going to become even more crucial as the government will have to deal with the uphill and time consuming task of rehabilitation. This will require huge funds to meet expenditure on the reconstruction of accommodation, provision of facilities for the victims, and adequate financial assistance to enable them to get back on their feet.

Long term measures need to be sustainable and capable of addressing environmental and demographic issues in a befitting manner. Meaningful success in the rehabilitation of the victims cannot be achieved without the full and timely support of the international community.

The colossal devastation caused by the floods has come at a time when Pakistan is already beset with the enormous losses incurred from fighting terrorism. No country with the resources and capacity of Pakistan could meet an assault of such magnitude on its economy. The international media is required to intensify its coverage in order to convince international leaders, private concerns, and the general public to extend their full support to Pakistan. A lot of those in international circles are hesitant in donating to Pakistan for the fear that such assistance might be pocketed by several corrupt institutions or politicians.

Yet, is this reason enough not to help the suffering victims? International aid agencies can always monitor the aid money and make sure that it is being invested in the intended areas. Pakistan’s response to the flood catastrophe depends upon the degree of financial assistance provided by the international community. If the international media provided half the coverage that it did for the Chilean miners, Pakistan would find enough helping hands to overcome the biggest humanitarian crisis of its history.

Sidra Tariq works as a cross-culture intern at atlantic-community.org. She holds a Masters Degree in International Relations from Quaid-i- Azam University, Islamabad.

Related Material:

  • 5
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
Nayab  Khan

October 22, 2010

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
VERY TRUE! ... international media's role was not at all momentous and same goes for Western countries support for the flood victims.

NOT AT ALL APPRECIABLE...

Good Work Sidra.. Keep it up!

Keep on writing articles like these.

=)
 
Unregistered User

October 23, 2010

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear Sidra,

In an effort to open more doors and minds to the challenge Pakistan and the world face my colleagues and I have opened a website for reconstruction and economic recovery --
http://www.pakrenewal.com

Along with early thoughts on strategies for meeting this challenge
we have developed the most comprehensive page of links to resources and news on the floods and recovery.

Thanks for you thoughts!
Ernie Lowe
 
Unregistered User

October 23, 2010

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Great Sdira
Tags: | X55 |
 
Sidra  Tariq

October 25, 2010

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear readers,

Thank you all for the comments.

Ernie! much thanks to you for posting the link to your impressive website. I hope you will continue to keep our readers updated about the future flood and economic recovery projects in Pakistan.

Best, Sidra.
 
Unregistered User

October 26, 2010

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
When you compare the flood disaster with the Chilean miners' coverage, I think that one can largely blame the government of Pakistan. It is surely in their power to organise and facilitate suitable photo-shoots and feed the right information.
In such a large disaster it is important to show what is being done, what is not being achieved, and what extra (international) help is needed. It is also essential that government leaders be seen to be taking an active part in supporting rescuers and seeing that refugees are being cared for.
Clear emphasis needs to be put on aid agencies and the work that they are doing. It is surely up to them to arrange suitable publicity. Perhaps the government has been hindering such reporting.
 
Erica  Mukherjee

November 29, 2010

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
The author's comparison with the coverage of the Chilean mining disaster and the Pakistani floods is a strong critique of the skewed focus of today's international media. Ever since "60 MInutes" proved that news could be entertaining back in 1968, the news media has become more and more entertainment focused. Even serious publications like the New York Times had a nearly minute-by-minute update on the day of the rescue. Yes, it was news, but it was also entertainment. With only 33 miners, it was easy to feel, as readers, that we "knew" the miners and "understood" their plight. I wouldn't at all be surprised if a movie comes out on the subject in a few years time.

The crisis in Pakistan is another story entirely. Average international news consumers simply cannot wrap their heads around the extend of the devastation in the country. We can repeat the figures about "an area the size of England" and "5 billion dollars in damages." However, we cannot really understand what happened, especially since so few of us have our livelihood tied to the land these days.

In the long term, it is important to work to change the emphasis of international news back to news, but in the short term, work should be done to "popularize" the crisis. Telling Western media consumers personal stories about real people always helps. I realize the suggestion of "marketing a crisis" seems a bit macabre, but if an advocacy campaign could be conceived to raise awareness about the individual human suffering in the region it might be that more aid money would come to region that truly needs it. And perhaps, a concerted effort to understand the individual lives of Pakistani citizens would help the country in the long run.
 
Meital  Tzobotaro

December 2, 2010

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
International media coverage of the Pakistani floods was, and still is, indeed disappointing to say the least, and outraging to be exact. However, i would like to point out that the media does not dictate foreign policy and assistance, it is merely reporting on the issues that will benefit them the most as a business.
I believe that our criticism should be focused towards the donor countries that failed to provide aid where it was needed most, and instead felt it was ok to concentrate on areas aligned with their security and political agendas.
This brings me to the larger issue, that humanitarian aid is not really about assisting in emergency situations and development, but is rather more about domestic interest.
This would would be a much better place is this was not so.
 
Unregistered User

December 10, 2010

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Nice one Sidra.
 
Omar  Juarez-Medina

December 11, 2010

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
"I wish I could credit them for meeting out the same treatment regarding the worst ever floods in the history of Pakistan, which have affected 20 million people and have exceeded the combined total of victims of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami as well as the 2005 Pakistan and 2010 Haiti earthquakes."

Are you saying the death toll is higher than these three disasters combined? Over 240,000 died in the 2004 Indian ocean Tsunami and estimates run between 90,000 to 230,000 dead in the Haiti 2010 earthquake.
 
Samira  Haza

December 30, 2010

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
"I wish I could credit them for meeting out the same treatment regarding the worst ever floods in the history of Pakistan, which have affected 20 million people and have exceeded the combined total of victims of the 2004 Indian Ocean Tsunami as well as the 2005 Pakistan and 2010 Haiti earthquakes."

I am sorry that the media has ignored Pakistan's plight, but this really was a ridiculous statement that you made. As Omar pointed out, hundreds of thousands died in the Indian Ocean Tsunami alone. The death toll from the Pakistan floods has been a few thousand.
 
Unregistered User

January 25, 2011

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I think to some extent the criticism is pessimist over here. The author is trying to portray the overall picture and trying to estimate the direct and indirect victims. This flood was unique in its own type as it devastated the country starting from one end flowed up to the other end crushing the lives and resources of lives, keeping in mind that 80% of population are depending on these resources to live. As a helpless poor country, this situation forced living creatures to a dead end and also will have impact for many years to come.

I think ground realities depicts the same as author is trying to explain.
 
Sidra  Tariq

January 26, 2011

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Dear readers,

I thank you all for the feed back and comments.

Dear Omar and Samira, I had mentioned that 20 million people were amongst the "affectees" ; I never said that the death toll was 20 million.

According to Valerie Amos, Under-Secretary-General and Emergency Relief Coordinator for the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, the floods in Pakistan have affected "almost 21 million people", making it one of the biggest humanitarian crisis in world history (for details, you can visit http://www.pakrenewal.com/)

Best, Sidra
 

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at atlantic-community.org


Community

You are in the archive of all articles published on atlantic-community.org from 2007 to 2012. To read the latest articles from our open think tank and network with community members, please go to our new website