Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

August 1, 2008 |  3 comments |  Print  Your Opinion  

Michaele Schreyer and Ralf Fuecks

The Next Big Project for the EU is Energy

Michaele Schreyer and Ralf Fuecks: Current energy crisis poses a significant threat to international economic and political stability. The current make-up of the EU is ill-equipped to deal with this challenge. The Union urgently needs an institutional reform: a European Community for Renewable Energy which would transform its economy into an energy-efficient system.

The global energy system is undergoing a structural crisis. At its heart lies the need to restrain climatic change while at the same time dealing with energy security in an era of rapidly growing demand. The widening gap between rising demand for energy and limited resources of oil and gas has, together with speculation, increased fuel prices to record levels. This in turn has raised the spectre of a recession. These combined challenges pose a significant threat to international economic and political stability.

The current make-up of the European Union, with its flagging institutional reform owing to the Irish No vote, is ill-equipped to deal with these challenges. An outdated Nice treaty that does not reflect the new realities of an EU with 27 members is impeding effective decision-making, thereby undermining the EU's role in a rapidly changing international system that is increasingly being shaped by rising powers such as China, India and Russia. The urgency for institutional reform is quite clear to everyone. Nevertheless, in times like these the EU cannot limit itself to institutional reform alone.

What is needed is a new European Community that can successfully tackle the combined challenges of climate change, energy security and sustainable competitiveness. As the former Commission president Jacques Delors has suggested, the EU needs to build an institution that can facilitate common action in this field. In comparison with the formative years of the Community - when both the European Coal and Steel Community and the European Atomic Energy Community pursued energy-oriented goals - there is a lack of common action to expand the use of renewable energy that mitigates climate change, provides energy security and increases European competitiveness by transforming its economy into an energy-efficient system.

At a time of climate change and escalating energy prices, the EU needs a European Community for Renewable Energy (ERENE) that can overcome our dependence on fossil fuels and meet the energy challenges of the new century. Such a community would create the conditions necessary to take full advantage of the EU's climatic, geological and hydrological diversity. Thanks to this diversity the EU has the potential to meet its total electricity demand with renewable energy.

This visionary goal, however, cannot be achieved by unco-ordinated individual action by member states alone. ERENE would develop a strategy to facilitate common action for a rapid shift to renewable energy in the electricity sector. Funded by revenue from the European Emissions Trading Scheme, it would support the research, development and dissemination of new technologies, establish innovative pilot projects, promote investments in renewable energy through a common European support scheme and contribute to the development of trans-European smart grids for the integration of renewable energy into the EU's electricity supply. It would also foster co-operation with non-EU states, particularly those with a large solar potential in the southern Mediterranean.

ERENE could be based either on the provisions for enhanced co-operation between member states under the aegis of the EU, or on a separate treaty. It would help the EU to achieve its climate and energy objectives of reducing greenhouse gases by 20 per cent and reaching a target of 20 per cent renewable energy by 2020. Moreover, it would prepare the ground for long-term targets beyond 2020. In addition, ERENE would boost the EU's competitiveness by supporting technological development and innovation.

The EU can, by creating ERENE, become a technological leader, facilitate the creation of new "green-collar" jobs, insulate its economy from rising energy prices and be an example in the fight against climate change for the rest of the world. As such, ERENE could, after the creation of a common internal market and a common currency, be a great new integration project for Europe, emphasising the vital importance of common action for Europe's future and ensuring that the instruments to deal with climate change and energy security are put in place. The EU needs another grand project to regain political momentum and to engage its citizens in a common European modernisation effort.

Michaele Schreyer is the former EU commissioner for budget (1999-2004); Ralf Fuecks is co-president of the Heinrich Böll Foundation, a think-tank and policy network affiliated with the German Greens. This article first appeared in The Financial Times on July 10 2008 and is republished here with the Mr Fuecks's kind permission.

 

Related materials from the Atlantic Community:

  • 24
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
Tags: | energy security | climate change | EU |
 
Comments
Jan-Friedrich  Kallmorgen

August 2, 2008

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Thanks for this stimulating piece!

What would be the next step to set up ERENE? Should one really rely on governments or EU institutions to take the lead at this great project? I don't believe so. This task requires big, generous thinking, not a new bureaucracy. While the EU should set the right framework and gives incentives, political entrepreneurship is needed.

Civil society actors should join forces with scientist, business and venture capital to develop a strategy with a road map and concrete milestones. A model could be the Clinton Global Initiative where organisations as private individuals commit themselves publicly to certain contributions to a plan. And as one can expect green technology to generate significant revenues there is also a long-term business case to be made.

Finally, I agree that this should be a European enterprise, but one should also look across the Atlantic, particularly to Silicon Valley, for ideas, networks and money. Maybe, the American Jeremy Rifkin and his "Third Industrial Revolution" also approach fits in here.

Looking forward to continuing this debate, Jan
 
Heinrich  Bonnenberg

August 5, 2008

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
The proposal to establish ERENE is an extremely promising idea to identify the very real potential of renewable energy resources in Europe, not only in EU, e.g. also Ukraine with its enormous agricultural possibilities should participate. Because of the various meteorological, geo- and hydrophysical, agricultural possibilities and the various structure of energy demand in Europe, we really need cross boarder discussion, evaluation and solutions.

For my understanding however, it is really essential that ERENE has to be based on facts and not on illusion. Already at the beginning of the project, we have to tell people, that

+ because of physics and economy, the renewable energy resources can only partly solve the energy problem,

+ the CO2 free combustion plant is a technical swindle and

+ nuclear energy will be a very important source for electricity in the future, by fission or by fusion.

We all should be honest.
 
Unregistered User

August 11, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
The problem is that national cultures within the EU dispose EU officials to see the energy future differently. Frau Schreyer is German. M Delors is French and he proposes a future European Energy Community not a European Renewable Energy Community. So appealing to the prestige of Delors is a bit sleight of hand. French officials want non fossil, non carbon energy not renewables. And that explains too why German scientists are investing in wind, solar and thermal across the Med while the French sell Algeria and Libya nuclear reactors! Subsidiarity is fine on home turf but it bodes ill for a united energy community plan- about half theEU member s are nuclear
Tags: | i3fru3p4 |
 

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at atlantic-community.org


Community

You are in the archive of all articles published on atlantic-community.org from 2007 to 2012. To read the latest articles from our open think tank and network with community members, please go to our new website