Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

October 4, 2011 |  2 comments |  Print  Your Opinion  

The Role of NGOs in Effectively Addressing Climate Change

Vijeta Rattani: Climate change is a broad concept of which global warning is just one facet. NGOs should take the lead in informing the world about the complex reality of climate change and move away from focusing exclusively on carbon emissions.


Climate change has emerged as one of the most defining issues of twenty-first century. Admittedly, it is an extremely broad concept which encompasses a wide spectrum of negative human-induced effects on the world’s environment. The current understanding of climate change tends to be limited to a few catch phrases such as global warming and carbon emission. Increased warming of the earth’s atmosphere due to industrial carbon emission is, however, just one aspect of the much larger process of climate change. Currently, the main focus regarding climate change is limited almost exclusively to the cause and effect of global warming. In order to move away from these labels, non-government organisations (NGOs) should take on the initiative of revealing the truth about the ongoing climate change debate.

Our climate is changing - this idea began gaining prominence in the late 1970s following the Stockholm Environment Convention. This period witnessed many alarming findings such as the melting of Arctic and Himalayan glaciers, discovery of the ozone hole, the rise in sea level, abrupt weather patterns and atypical heat conditions. This lead to the creation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) – an international treaty designed to address the issue on a global scale. Simultaneously, concern with climate change brought about the formation of a colossal number of environmental NGOs across the globe.

The UNFCCC has stressed the impact of direct and indirect human enterprises on the climate system. It has highlighted that heedless anthropogenic activities "alter the composition of the global atmosphere" (UNFCCC Charter 1992). Examples of this can be seen across the world and include exploitation of water resources, fossil fuels, uneven land use patterns, uncontrolled irrigation activities, deforestation, over mining, pollution and industrial carbon emissions. Such short-sighted and unsustainable activity affects the ecosystem and causes the earth's climate system to change abruptly. Uneven precipitation, changes in weather cycles and monsoon pattern, incremental increase in earth's temperature, ozone depletion, rise of sea level and destruction of many varieties of flora and fauna – all of these pieces of evidence illustrate the general global transition.

Despite the fact that the causes and effect of climate change vary, the UNFCCC focuses its policy-making primarily on carbon emissions resulting from global warming. Moreover, in the present discourse, the terms climate change and global warming are often used interchangeably. Both state and non-state actors have, however, hardly addressed the ambiguity of climate change as a concept. Even the European Union – an active leader in global climate policy – has failed to notice and address this issue.

By reducing global warming to the issue of unchecked industrial carbon emissions, the West intends to curb the growth rate of rapidly developing nations such as India and China. Equating the issue of climate change with global warming is a ploy used by the West to serve its own selfish economic interests.

Localised approaches are needed in order to find a serious solution to this global challenge. With their broad base of public support for working on behalf of environmental causes, NGOs can be tremendously helpful in the process. Owing to their close interactions with people, they can inform policy-makers at both national and international levels about the core realities of climate change at different strata.

The cooperation between NGOs and the media is essential in bringing data supporting a broader spectrum of causes and effects of climate change before public.

Both top-down approaches with emphasis on government actors as well as bottom-up strategies involving grassroots decision-making should be considered by NGOs in generating awareness the diverse aspects of climate change as a global problem. History shows that NGOs have acted as powerful pressure groups and made a difference in societies in the past. Therefore they can make a valuable contribution in tackling the threat of climate change.

Climate is changing for worse. This is a real problem that needs concrete solutions. The devastating effects of climate change are ostensible in day-to-day life and they have the potential to alter the destiny of mankind. Helping tackle the problem is a responsibility we all share globally. And that’s why the role of non-state actors like NGOs in bridging the gap between policy-makers and public is so crucial in combating climate change.

Vijeta Rattani is a Ph.D. scholar in Centre for European Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi, India.

  • 1
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
Member deleted

October 25, 2011

  • 3
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
Thank you for your article. I agree that NGO’s can be extremely useful in bridging the gap between policy-makers and the public. In terms of educating, and information sharing, their role can be invaluable. I also understand your argument that global warming caused by carbon emissions is only one part of climate change, but I would have been interested to hear more about how you define climate change in its entirety.

I would argue that because climate change is such a large and complex issue, policy makers have to start somewhere. Because carbon emissions are one of the largest contributors to global warming, and therefore also climate change, it seems logical that the UNFCCC would place its focus on an issue that can be somewhat regulated by the international community. Of course this raises questions surrounding equity and justice in climate change policy, issues that need to be addressed, but at present do we have any other real alternatives?

Ideally we would approach the problem from both sides, that is utilizing both bottom-up and top-down approaches. However in order to address climate change in its entirety, there would need to be a real pedagogical shift away from consumerism and perhaps even capitalism. But with conflicting national interests, often shaped by economic interests, and the West’s dependency on cheap fossil fuels that has shaped an entire way of life, I have to wonder whether that will ever really be possible?
 
Thomas Benedick Alexander Williams

October 28, 2011

  • 2
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
I agree that the climate change debate can often be over simplified but I think this comes out of a desperation to get people on side and act on the substantial issues we face. It is all too easy for people to turn a blind eye to what is going to happen to the climate at a later date because of our actions now. Making the debate more complicated may hamper the already weak will of governments to act on climate change. People simply do not want to engage in the debate because they are too afraid of the consequences and too unwilling to make the necessary changes in their lives that may prevent climate change getting worse. Many people in the world remain unconvinced by the science and will seize on any thing to justify their denials. You seem to come from the position that everyone is on side and willing to act on climate change as we understand it whereas the reality is that we are very far from agreeing a world consensus on climate change.
 

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at atlantic-community.org


Community

You are in the archive of all articles published on atlantic-community.org from 2007 to 2012. To read the latest articles from our open think tank and network with community members, please go to our new website