Issues Navigator

Global Challenges

Strategic Regions

Domestic Debates

Tag cloud

See All Tags

April 16, 2008 |  1 comment |  Print  Your Research  

Lukas  Vitalijus

Term Paper: Transatlantic Relations and "New Europe"

Lukas Vitalijus: Going-in-Between in Order to Survive

 

After almost a decade of long and intense negotiations, Central and Eastern European countries (CEEC) have finally been firmly anchored in the West. Their most important foreign policy goals - membership in the European Union (EU) and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) have been achieved in the wake of the new millennium. But just as the region appears poised to realise this historical triumph, new and dark clouds have appeared on the horizon.

The paradox is that just as Central and Eastern Europeans arrived at their final destination in the West, the Western Alliance which they have worked so hard to join increasingly appears in disarray. The aim of this paper is thus to look at this new situation through the perspective of the CEEC. Assessing the presumed rift between the security outlooks of the so-called ‘old' and ‘new' EU and NATO member states, which stems in part due to their different approaches towards the United States in general and American leadership in the region in particular, it sheds a new light on the concept of the Atlanticism looking beyond the traditional explanations (such as recent historical experience and CEEC's ‘debt of gratitude').

Using the analysis of the small states and drawing on the findings of a realist theory in international relations this paper introduces an alternative way to approach and explain foreign policy behaviour of CEEC. As a result, it demonstrates that initially prescribed pro-Americanism of "new" Europeans is often misinterpreted and that a real picture may indeed be much more complex than conventional wisdom of convenience suggests.

 
  • 4
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this Article! What's this?

 
 
Comments
Ilyas M. Mohsin

May 31, 2008

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
For the 'new Europe', which was attracted by the glamour of prosperity/
democratic institutions therein during the coldwar days, the objective realities have changed since the breakup of the Soviet Empire.
Accordingly there is more dissension than harmony in'old Europe' which one can attribute to democratic options/ divergent interests and lack of any credible common threat. So currently for those courting one-Europe etc, the message is All that Glitters in not Gold.
One hope; maybe the next US Administartion will focus more on such issues instead of wasting huge resources in chasing bugbears as stressed by McCllen of White House fame last week.
 

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at atlantic-community.org


Community

You are in the archive of all articles published on atlantic-community.org from 2007 to 2012. To read the latest articles from our open think tank and network with community members, please go to our new website