Afghanistan Needs Peace First, Money Later
David Cortright, The Daily Star | August 2, 2012
![]()
The annual $4 billion in aid pledged to secure Afghanistan's futures will not foment economic development until there is peace. ++ After 30 years of war, it is no wonder the country is so underdeveloped. ++ It has been challenging to negotiate a settlement because neither the US nor the Taliban are willing to give in to the others' demands. ++ A peace accord, overseen by a UN team, between insurgents and the Kabul regime would reduce the need for large unaffordable security forces and allow attention to be focused on other priorities.



Sun, Aug 5th 2012, 20:19
Erika Schulten, NYU Graduate Student, Center for Global Affairs, (4)
There can be no middle ground with the Taliban- their ideology and practices will never afford women and girls basic human rights. Just a month ago, the world was horrified to see the video of a woman murdered because of a dispute between two Taliban leaders who laid claim to her as property while a large group of cheering men looked on. 'Peace' will always be contrived as long as citizens remain burdened by the 'darkness' of illiteracy, they cannot move forward in peace as long as armed, uneducated groups with 'fluid' allegiances and corrupt government officials have power over the rest. We cannot negotiate with the Taliban. Women's rights are human rights and cannot be sacrificed.