2 comments |  Print this Article | E-Mail Top Press Commentary  


From Globalisation to "Deglobalisation"

Gideon Rachman, Financial Times | February 3, 2009

To date, the world has known globalization. ++ But the financial crisis has spurred talks on the new trend of deglobalization: shifting focus from the international level to the domestic one. ++ This does not seem to concern the Davos participants: globalization was reaffirmed and it was argued that the benefits of free market economics will always trump calls for protectionism. ++ While in theory globalization conquers all, political realities may well force globalization junkies to prioritize the needs and demands of domestic voters.

 

 
 
Comments
Member deleted

Tue, Feb 3rd 2009, 13:18

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
After the story about a global village, one is wondering about the terms and their meanings and what they imply, along with their unarticulated 'necessary conditions' premise. Now having theives around obviously is going to turn the village shop-keeper into a pauper and have many households there not being able to fulfill certain needs. Some would have salt missing from their tables, others may have bacon nightmares (usually seen as similar to the desert mirage) and yet may find their hunting pellets in short supply, and so forth.
Now does the shop keeper down the shutters or do the theives make the shop redundant? Between the talks of 'globalization' and 'de-globalization' and those who feel the pinch of thievery - in the global village. Well, common sense would suggest the obvious and that is what the German Chancellor Merkel has proposed - for an Economic Security Council. Now, obviously there is a huge difference between thieves and lotus-eaters and even the higly educated notions of those professing 'anarchy' via the notion of negative freedom ( as erudite terms go and that contribute towards much of confusion and actually do often help the thieves wear 'erudite coats', if not give the poor lotus-eater a bad name!). Again, there is also the problem of which school the vilalge-children go to. Swedish neighbourhood (district) schools and village schools in Pakistan and/or India are slightly different - even if only appearances would have mattered. We all know how they do not. So, once again we are back to the German Chancellor Merkel's proposal. We can not wish away the global village. However, about wishing away the village shop - well?
 
Unregistered User

Tue, Dec 1st 2009, 23:54

  • 0
  •  
  •  
  • No rating possible
  • No rating possible
I like this comment! What's this?
would you tell me how global village differs from globalization?
 

Commenting has been deactivated in the archive. We appreciate your comments on our more recent articles at atlantic-community.org